Markets
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Financial Crisis
- Madoff Scandal
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
General Moly Announces Third Quarter Results
General Moly (NYSE AMEX: GMO)(TSX: GMO) announced its unaudited financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009.
Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately $2.4 million ($0.03 per share) compared to a loss of $2.8 million ($0.04 per share) for the year ago period. Net loss for the nine month period ending September 30, 2009 was approximately $8.1 million ($0.11 per share) compared to a loss of $11.8 million ($0.17 per share) for the year ago period.
Consolidated cash balance at the end of the third quarter was approximately $59 million compared to approximately $70 million at the end of the second quarter as a result of $9 million in development and equipment deposit costs and $2 million in General and Administrative costs. Financial information is included at the back of this release.
PERMITTING UPDATE
The Company expects the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to complete an administrative Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in late 2009 and to receive its Record of Decision (ROD) in the third quarter of 2010. The two outstanding technical reports related to regional hydrology and pit lake geochemistry were completed and submitted to the BLM in late October and early November. The Company believes these studies confirm that the Mt. Hope project will have minimal long term impact to local ground water.
Bruce D. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer, said, “Finalizing our hydrologic reports after gathering extensive additional data and completing robust models represents a significant milestone in the Mt. Hope permitting effort as it paves the way to see the draft EIS ready for public comment in the first quarter of next year.”
FINANCING PLAN UPDATE
The Company is continuing work with Cutfield Freeman & Co., a London-based financial advisory firm, to seek bi-lateral agency and off-take related financing as well as with Credit Suisse and Barclays to seek bank project financing to augment the projected agency financing. During the third quarter, the Company introduced a number of proposals to interested parties seeking off-take related financing or Mt. Hope project equity in conjunction with bi-lateral agency financing. Additionally, the Company continues to monitor the bank project finance market, which is returning to health, as well as other capital markets. With $59 million in cash at the end of the third quarter, the Company continues to anticipate having adequate liquidity through the end of 2010 without accessing new sources of financing while maintaining the current cash conservation strategy.
MT. HOPE PROJECT CAPITAL ESTIMATE AND PROJECT ECONOMICS
During the third quarter, the Company reviewed capital cost requirements for the Mt. Hope project based on completing 60% engineering, and confirmed its previous estimate of $1,039 million. During its review, the Company identified potential opportunities to reduce initial capital by as much as $74 million if the project were to be constructed today, primarily consisting of lower construction material costs, reductions to contingency on already committed equipment, and lower mining equipment costs. However, given the Company’s expectation to construct the project in a healthier economic environment beginning in late 2010, it has elected to maintain its current capital guidance, which includes $86 million of contingency. The Company will strive to ultimately capture these identified potential cost saving opportunities along with continually evaluating other cost saving opportunities. The Mt. Hope project’s anticipated capital requirements are broken down in the following table.
| Mt. Hope Project Capital Requirements | |
| Category | Expenditure (million US$) |
| Mining equipment | 134 |
| Milling equipment | 175 |
| Construction | 347 |
| Owners cost, pre-stripping | 170 |
| Taxes, freight, spares | 68 |
| EPCM | 59 |
| Contingency |
86 |
| Total Capital | $1,039 million |
| Bonding and pre-paid items | $115 million |
| Total Capital Requirement | $1,154 million |
| Sustaining capital (40+ years) | $642 million |
The Company also reviewed projected operating costs for the Mt. Hope project, which remain in-line with previous guidance. Using $80 per barrel oil equivalent energy costs, direct operating costs for the Mt. Hope project over the first full five years of operation are anticipated to average $5.29 per pound, and Costs Applicable to Sales (CAS) per pound, including anticipated royalties calculated at $15 per pound molybdenum, are anticipated to average $6.38 per pound. For each $10 change in per barrel oil costs, Mt. Hope’s anticipated direct operating cost change approximately $0.10 per pound. A table reconciling direct operating costs and CAS per pound as well as a table providing estimated operating costs for the project over its mine life can be found at the back of this release.
Economics for the Mt. Hope project remain in-line with previous estimates as well. On a look forward basis, at $15 per pound flat moly prices, the after-tax Net Present Value (NPV) of General Moly’s 80% equity interest in the Mt. Hope project, discounted at 8%, is anticipated to be $1.028 billion, approximately $14.19 per outstanding share, representing an internal rate of return (IRR) of over 26%. For every $1 change in the moly price between $10 and $20 per pound, the after-tax NPV of General Moly’s 80% interest in Mt. Hope changes by approximately $180 million. In addition to the project’s NPV, General Moly has approximately $59 million in cash on its balance sheet, approximately $0.81 per outstanding share.
MOLYBDENUM MARKET UPDATE
Over the third quarter of 2009, spot molybdenum prices traded between $10.15 and $17.45 per pound, ending the quarter at $14.13 and trading as low as $11.00 per pound more recently. Price fluctuations during the period were primarily attributable to changing Chinese demand patterns. Although Chinese crude steel production continues at record levels, Chinese imports of molybdenum have diminished recently, causing price weakness. Prices well above the lows seen earlier this year continue to be supported by Chinese molybdenum imports, increasing steel capacity utilization rates in developing nations, modestly improving steel capacity utilization in the United States and Europe, an end to global inventory de-stocking, and molybdenum supply reductions.
RESERVE AND RESOURCE ESTIMATE UPDATE
Beginning in the third quarter of this year, the Company undertook an initiative to update its resource model of the Mt. Hope molybdenum deposit based on additional geologic interpretation and the incorporation of 96 previously-drilled core and reverse circulation holes that were not included in the 2007 Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS). These holes include drilling for the purpose of water modeling, waste rock sampling, geotechnical evaluation, and infill holes targeting the first ten years of production that were drilled following the creation of the resource model used in the 2007 BFS.
With an improved geologic database and an enhanced deposit model, the Company will strive to further optimize the mine plan. An updated reserve estimate and 43-101 compliant resource estimate and optimized mine plan are anticipated to be finalized early next year.
RESTATEMENT OF GAAP RESULTS
On November 3, 2009, the Company determined that its unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 contained an error with respect to the balance sheet classification of POS-Minerals interest in Eureka Moly, LLC. Following implementation of FASB guidance for noncontrolling interest effective January 1, 2009, we classified the POS-Minerals interest as noncontrolling interest as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 as a component of equity. Previously, the POS-Minerals interest was classified as minority interest within temporary equity. Management determined that POS-Minerals interest in the LLC is more appropriately classified as temporary equity. On November 9, 2009, the Company filed a Form 8-K describing the effect on the balance sheet of the restated amounts.
Additional information on the Company’s third quarter results will be available in General Moly’s third quarter Form 10-Q, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and posted on the Company’s website.
|
GENERAL MOLY, INC.
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) |
|||||
|
September 30, |
December 31, 2008 |
||||
| ASSETS | |||||
| CURRENT ASSETS | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ 58,646 | $ 78,462 | |||
| Restricted cash – Eureka Moly, LLC | 37 | 13,915 | |||
| Deposits, prepaid expenses and other current assets | 214 | 326 | |||
| Total Current Assets | 58,897 | 92,703 | |||
|
Mining properties, land and water rights |
97,432 | 79,292 | |||
| Deposits on project property, plant and equipment | 40,214 | 31,499 | |||
| Restricted cash held for electricity transmission | 12,286 | 12,545 | |||
| Restricted cash held for reclamation bonds | 1,133 | 1,133 | |||
| Non-mining property and equipment, net | 605 | 763 | |||
| Other assets | 2,994 | 2,994 | |||
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ 213,561 | $ 220,929 | |||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||
| CURRENT LIABILITIES | |||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ 6,175 | $ 6,692 | |||
| Current portion of long term debt | 121 | 128 | |||
| Total Current Liabilities | 6,296 | 6,820 | |||
| Provision for post closure reclamation and remediation costs | 586 | 731 | |||
| Deferred revenue | 100 | — | |||
| Long term debt, net of current portion | 240 | 330 | |||
| Total Liabilities | 7,222 | 7,881 | |||
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
- | - | |||
|
CONTINGENTLY REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST |
99,761 | 100,000 | |||
| EQUITY | |||||
| General Moly, Inc. stockholders’ equity | |||||
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized,
72,437,538 |
72 | 72 | |||
| Additional paid-in capital | 186,812 | 185,179 | |||
| Accumulated deficit before exploration stage | (213 | ) | (213 | ) | |
| Accumulated deficit during exploration and development stage | (80,093 | ) | (71,990 | ) | |
| Total General Moly, Inc. stockholders’ equity | 106,578 | 113,048 | |||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ 213,561 | $ 220,929 | |||
|
GENERAL MOLY, INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited - In thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended |
January 1, 2002 |
||||||||||||
|
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||
| REVENUES | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ — | |||||||||
| OPERATING EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||
| Exploration and evaluation | 273 | 1,084 | 638 | 5,270 | 37,342 | |||||||||
| General and administrative expense | 2,083 | 2,204 | 7,719 | 8,119 | 47,002 | |||||||||
| TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES | 2,356 | 3,288 | 8,357 | 13,389 | 84,344 | |||||||||
| LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | (2,356 | ) | (3,288 | ) | (8,357 | ) | (13,389 | ) | (84,344 | ) | ||||
| OTHER INCOME | ||||||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income | 6 | 530 | 15 | 1,563 | 3,947 | |||||||||
| Other income | — | — | — | — | 65 | |||||||||
| TOTAL OTHER INCOME | 6 | 530 | 15 | 1,563 | 4,012 | |||||||||
| LOSS BEFORE TAXES | (2,350 | ) | (2,758 | ) | (8,342 | ) | (11,826 | ) | (80,332 | ) | ||||
| INCOME TAXES | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
|
CONSOLIDATED
NET LOSS |
$ (2,350 | ) | $ (2,758 | ) | $ (8,342 | ) | $ (11,826 | ) | $ (80,332 | ) | ||||
| LESS: NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTINGENTLY REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST | — | — | 239 | — | 239 | |||||||||
| NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO GENERAL MOLY, INC. | $ (2,350 | ) | $ (2,758 | ) | $ (8,103 | ) | $ (11,826 | ) | $ (80,093 | ) | ||||
| BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO GENERAL MOLY PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK | $ (0.03 | ) | $ (0.04 | ) | $ (0.11 | ) | $ (0.17 | ) | ||||||
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING – BASIC AND DILUTED | 72,393 | 71,353 | 72,154 | 69,663 | ||||||||||
|
GENERAL MOLY, INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited – In thousands) |
|||||||||||||
|
Nine Months Ended |
January 1, 2002 (Inception of Exploration Stage) to September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||
|
September 30, |
September 30, |
||||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Consolidated Net Loss | $ (8,342 |
) |
|
$ (11,826 |
) |
|
$ (80,332 |
) |
|
||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: | |||||||||||||
| Services and expenses paid with common stock | — | — | 1,990 | ||||||||||
| Writedown of deposits on property, plant and equipment | 378 | — | 378 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 259 | 225 | 812 | ||||||||||
| Equity compensation for employees and directors | 1,330 | 2,029 | 13,314 | ||||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in deposits, prepaid expenses and other | 112 | 53 | (122 | ) | |||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in restricted cash held for electricity transmission | 259 | (12,545 | ) | (12,286 | ) | ||||||||
| (Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (1,027 | ) | 2,951 | 5,643 | |||||||||
| (Decrease) increase in post closure reclamation and remediation costs | (145 | ) | 219 | 377 | |||||||||
| Net cash used by operating activities | (7,176 | ) | (18,894 |
) |
|
(70,226 | ) | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Payments for the purchase of equipment | (7 | ) | (457 |
) |
|
(1,331 | ) | ||||||
| Purchase of securities | — | — | (137 | ) | |||||||||
| Purchase and development of mining properties, land and water rights | (17,520 | ) | (32,422 |
) |
|
(91,274 | ) | ||||||
| Deposits on property, plant and equipment | (9,093 | ) | (22,849 |
) |
|
(40,592 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from option to purchase agreement | 100 | — | 100 | ||||||||||
| Increase in restricted cash held for reclamation bonds | — | (355 |
) |
|
|
(642 | ) | ||||||
|
Cash provided by sale of marketable securities |
— | — | 246 | ||||||||||
| Net cash used by investing activities | (26,520 | ) | (56,083 |
) |
|
(133,630 | ) | ||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of issuance costs | 99 | 20,494 | 165,204 | ||||||||||
| Cash proceeds from POS-Minerals Corporation | — | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||||||
| Cash paid to POS-Minerals Corporation for purchase price adjustment | — | (2,994 | ) | (2,994 | ) | ||||||||
| Decrease (increase) in restricted cash – Eureka Moly, LLC | 13,878 | (41,578 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in debt | (97 | ) | 192 | 283 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 13,880 | 76,114 | 262,456 | ||||||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (19,816 | ) | 1,137 | 58,600 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 78,462 | 78,371 | 46 | ||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ 58,646 | $ 79,508 | $ 58,646 | ||||||||||
| NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
| Equity compensation capitalized as development | $714 | $ 1,801 | $4,843 | ||||||||||
| Restricted cash held for reclamation bond acquired in an acquisition | — | — | 491 | ||||||||||
| Post closure reclamation and remediation costs and accounts payable assumed in an acquisition | — | — | 263 | ||||||||||
| Common stock and warrants issued for property and equipment | — | — | 1,586 | ||||||||||
Additional detail related to Mt. Hope’s anticipated operating costs are included in the table below.
| Unit Cost by Mine Phase | ||
| Time Period |
Direct |
Costs Applicable |
| First full 5 years | $5.29 | $6.38 |
| First full 10 years | $5.75 | $6.85 |
| First full 32 years (conclusion of mining) | $6.90 | $8.00 |
| Life of Mine (40+ years) | $7.13 | $8.34 |
| 1. Calculated at $80 per barrel oil equivalent energy prices | ||
| 2. Calculated assuming royalties and Nevada Net Proceeds Tax based on $15 per pound molybdenum | ||
Reconciliation between Direct Operating Costs, a non-GAAP measure, and Costs Applicable to Sales (CAS), a GAAP measure, is provided in the table below, which is calculated assuming an $80 per barrel oil equivalent operating costs.
| Costs Applicable to Sales (CAS) Reconciliation for first full five years | |
| Direct operating cost | $5.29 |
| Royalty payments1 | $0.71 |
| Nevada net proceeds tax2 | $0.38 |
| Costs Applicable to Sales | $6.38 |
|
1. Royalty payments are a function of assumed molybdenum prices
realized. Please see |
|
|
2. Nevada net proceeds tax are a function of assumed
profitability, which are a function of |
|
General Moly is a U.S.-based molybdenum mineral development, exploration and mining company listed on the NYSE AMEX (formerly the American Stock Exchange) and the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol GMO. Our primary asset, our interest in the Mt. Hope project located in central Nevada, is considered one of the world's largest and highest grade molybdenum deposits. Combined with our second molybdenum property, the Liberty project that is also located in central Nevada, our goal is to become the largest primary molybdenum producer by the middle of the next decade. For more information on the Company, please visit our website at http://www.generalmoly.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements herein that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated, expected or implied. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the Company's ability to obtain required permits to commence production and its ability to raise required financing, metals price and production volatility, exploration risks and results, and project development risks. For a detailed discussion of risks and other factors that may impact these forward looking statements please refer to the Risk Factors and other discussion contained in the Company's quarterly and annual periodic reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, as the same are amended from time to time, on file with the SEC. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements.