Markets

U.S. close in 6 hrs, 24 mins
10,254.07
-210.33
 
2.01%
2,124.50
-51.55
 
2.37%
1,084.81
-25.82
 
2.32%
101.375
0.5312
 
0.53%
5,199.55
5.42
 
0.10%
9,081.52
-301.72
 
3.22%
21,134.50
-1,075.91
 
4.84%
-0.0114
 
0.76%
0.48
 
0.56%
1,150.00
-37.00
 
3.12%
73.20
-4.76
 
6.11%
Get Quote for:

Congress Delays Digital TV Switch

By JOELLE TESSLER
,
AP
posted: 294 DAYS 23 HOURS AGO
comments: 402
filed under:
Text SizeAAA
WASHINGTON (Feb. 4) - Congress is giving consumers four more months to prepare for the upcoming transition from analog to digital television broadcasting.
Skip over this content
The House on Wednesday voted 264-158 to postpone the shutdown of analog TV signals to June 12, to address growing concerns that too many Americans won't be ready in time for the Feb. 17 deadline that Congress had set three years ago. The Senate passed the measure unanimously last week and the bill now heads to President Barack Obama for his signature.
The change is being required because digital signals are more efficient than analog, and ending analog will free up valuable space in the nation's airwaves.
The delay is a victory for the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress, who maintain that the previous administration mismanaged efforts to ensure that all consumers - particularly poor, rural and minority Americans - will be prepared for the switchover.
The Nielsen Co. estimates that more than 6.5 million U.S. households that rely on analog TV sets to pick up over-the-air broadcast signals still are not ready. People who subscribe to cable or satellite TV or have a newer TV with a digital tuner will not be affected.
"The passage of this bipartisan legislation means that millions of Americans will have the time they need to prepare for the conversion," the White House said in a statement. "We will continue to work with Congress to improve the information and assistance available to American consumers in advance of June 12, especially those in the most vulnerable communities."
Skip over this content
Wednesday's vote came one week after House Republicans blocked the bill under a special fast-track procedure that required two-thirds support to pass. This time, the bill passed the House under a regular floor vote, which only requires a simple majority.
"If almost 6 percent of the nation's households lose all TV service, I think most people would declare the digital TV transition to be a failure," Rick Boucher, D-Va., chairman of House Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet, said on the House floor Wednesday.
Opponents of a delay warned, however, that the move will confuse consumers, create added costs for television stations that would continue broadcasting both analog and digital signals for four more months and burden wireless companies and public safety agencies waiting for the airwaves that will be freed up by the switchover.
"It's time for us to move forward on this and keep our word to the American people," said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., calling for the transition to proceed Feb. 17.
Democrats have tried to address these concerns by allowing broadcast stations to make the switch to digital signals sooner than the June deadline if they choose. It is unclear how many TV stations plan to take advantage of this option.
Joe Barton of Texas, the top Republican on the House Commerce Committee, has raised concerns that interference issues could prevent some stations from turning off before June 12, because they are scheduled to use new frequencies for their digital broadcasts.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-02-02 10:06:23
Bookmark:

Recent Comments

1 - 10 of 402
402 comments

MChrist452 02:55:28 PM Feb 05 2009

I find it very sad that so many here posting seem to think that those that aren't ready for the digital transition are "useless", "lazy", "procrastinators", etc. They also don't seem to feel that these people have the right or need to watch television.Many of these people are hard working, sometimes holding several jobs just trying to get by. Don't they deserve to be able to see the news, be alerted to emergency situations, or just chill for an hour after a long, difficult day? Coupons have only been available over the past year...not three years...and once you have applied, you can't reapply. I really feel for you people that might have to endure a few more months of ads! Too bad you don't have a real problem. SELFISH IDIOTS!

MChrist452 02:35:38 PM Feb 05 2009

Fine and great for all that will have a signal. There is more to this issue than some of you realize. This whole thing was not well planned out. I know a number of individuals that applied for and received the coupons, only to have them expire before they were able to purchase a box. They just weren't available in the quantities required and disappeared off store shelves before people could get them. I'm talking about rural communities that don't have alot of options available to them. Most of these people are working poor and can't afford to upgrade their televisions or purchase dish or cable. In addition in the rural areas the digital signal isn't working all that well. With the analog signal, it might have been "snowy" at times, but at least you had a signal. With digital it's all of nothing....no in between. Although I have a dish service, I personally have one television on a converter box. There are days when I can pick up a nice crisp picture and lots of channels and

UNITEDPAINTINGS 02:29:17 PM Feb 05 2009

Again, Congress panders to the useless.

Budzbyme 01:51:00 PM Feb 05 2009

Seriously, isn't there more important things going on than to waste their time changing a bill about digital tv? Just switch it already, if it's not that important to those 6 million people who have yet to that converter, why should it affect the switch over? Small potatoes compared to the BIG issues facing us today.........

JEEPMDS 01:48:06 PM Feb 05 2009

I HAVE A BOX FOR IN CASE I NEED IT , I PUT ON ON A 13INCH PORTABLE, IT WORKS GREAT AND PULLS IN ALOT OF NEW LOCAL BROADCASTING, THAT YOU DONT GET WITH JUST THE RABBIT EARS. I WELCOME THE CHANGE, WHENEVER IT IS.

YankeeMillennia1 01:19:28 PM Feb 05 2009

Jesus People had 3 years to do this......friggen democrats....aww poor people lets worry about them and screw everyone else...just buy a damn converter box and stop whining...

DSpicer178 01:13:56 PM Feb 05 2009

Rwzn2bix : You have to do a set up with the converter box ......

KirLaThom 01:09:39 PM Feb 05 2009

This is ridiculous. I am sick to death of seeing the announcements about the conversion. Just do it already. 6 million people need to either wake up or alert their congress person that they don't care about television one way or the other. Take the rest of America out of their misery and get it done. Don't make all of us pay for those 6 million that have refused to act.

JerryC09 12:57:39 PM Feb 05 2009

My nephew in Jacksonville has an old 27" analog tv. He used to get little but snow on it. He bought a converter box, and the digital channels he watches on it now look as good as or better than cable. No snow whatsoever!

DMmusicfor 12:38:02 PM Feb 05 2009

PEOPLE DONT EXCEPT CHANGE UNTIL FORCED TO. THE SAME OLD BITTY THAT ISNT READY FOR THE DIGITAL SWITCH IS GOING TO BE THE SAME OLD BITTY NOT READY FOUR MIONTHS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!!

1 - 10 of 402
402 comments

Add your own Comments

Interest Rates

TypeCurrentAPR
30 Yr Fixed Mtg5.16%5.39%
5/1 ARM4.32%4.24%
$30K HELOC5.82%0.00%
36 Month New Car Loan7.20%0.00%
1 Yr CD1.59%1.60%

Headlines From AOL Money & Finance Partners