Markets

U.S. open in 3 hrs, 23 mins
10,433.71
-17.24
 
0.16%
2,169.18
-6.83
 
0.31%
1,105.65
-0.59
 
0.05%
100.594
0.4062
 
0.41%
5,353.96
30.00
 
0.56%
9,441.64
40.06
 
0.43%
22,611.80
188.66
 
0.84%
0.0005
 
0.03%
-0.54
 
0.61%
1,176.80
11.00
 
0.94%
76.34
0.32
 
0.42%
Get Quote for:

Auto Industry Faces Major Changes

By DOUGLASS K. DANIEL
,
AP
posted: 282 DAYS 16 HOURS AGO
comments: 1700
Text SizeAAA
WASHINGTON (Feb. 15) - President Barack Obama's senior adviser said Sunday that any plan to shore up the auto industry will need to require sacrifice by all involved, from auto workers and industry executives to shareholders and creditors.
General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC are expected to submit plans to the government by a Tuesday deadline to show how they can repay billions in loans and become viable in spite of a drop in auto sales not seen for a generation.
"We need an auto industry in this country. There are millions of lives, livelihoods that depend on it," White House adviser David Axelrod said on "Meet the Press" on NBC. "We have a real interest in seeing the auto industry survive, but it's going to require a major restructuring of the auto industry."
Negotiations over who sacrifices what appear to be stalled with the deadline just two days away. Concession talks between GM and the United Auto Workers union remained on hold Sunday, according to a person briefed on the negotiations.
UAW negotiators walked out of the talks Friday night in a dispute over swapping stock for cash payments into a union-run trust fund that will take over retiree health care costs starting next year.
The person, who did not want to be identified because the talks are private, said nothing had changed since Saturday, when neither side bargained. Another person said Saturday that talks with Chrysler had slowed and that the UAW appeared to be bargaining in earnest with Ford Motor Co., the healthiest of the Detroit automakers and the only one not taking government loans.
Asked if the U.S. economy could withstand a bankruptcy at GM, Axelrod didn't respond directly. Nor did he directly address a question about whether the Obama administration would let GM go into bankruptcy, at least at this point.
"I'm not going to prejudge anything. I think that there is going to have to be a restructuring of those companies. I'm not going to get into the mode of how that happens. We'll wait and see what they have to say on Tuesday," he told "Fox News Sunday."
Executives at the two automakers have said bankruptcy would not benefit their companies because consumers would be reluctant to buy cars from an automaker that might go out of business.
"How that restructuring comes is something that has to be determined," he said. "But it's going to be something that's going to require sacrifice not just from the auto workers but also from creditors, from shareholders and the executives who run the company. And everyone's going to have to get together here to build companies that can compete in the future."
Axelrod wouldn't say whether the administration would offer the auto industry more bailout money. GM already has borrowed $9.4 billion to stay in business, and it would receive an addition $4 billion if the Treasury Department approves its viability plan. Chrysler wants $3 billion more on top of the $4 billion it has already borrowed.
"We need to see what it is that they come up with this week," he said.
In Detroit, GM and Chrysler have been discussing concessions with the United Auto Workers. Talks with GM broke off Friday night over the issue of health care for retirees.
"This is a difficult situation," Axelrod said. "Everyone's going to have to continue to work toward a solution."
AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.
On the Net:
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-02-15 12:16:36
Bookmark:

Recent Comments

1 - 10 of 1700
1700 comments

HCHEVY 05:29:47 AM Feb 19 2009

MKN84....... Being proud of buying foreign cars (or anything else for that matter) is like being proud of wetting the bed.

FBrouss211 10:26:56 PM Feb 17 2009

We've lost many industries to foreign countries over the years. TVs, steros, appliances, furniture, clothing and many, many more. Thousands..millions of jobs were lost and no rescue was offered for all those folks.No matter what we do; we're gonna pay more for less. What's wrong with this approach... immediately send home all illegals; let the pay for those jobs increase due to demand so Americans will take the available jobs...and then start over with "BUY AMERICAN". Sure, we get less for our money but at least we have a moving economy again. We've had it too good for too long. Now it's pay back time.

Gtp9t9 07:56:34 PM Feb 17 2009

MKN84-You call yourself an AMERICAN! Sorry excuse!

Lionview 05:56:31 PM Feb 17 2009

I believe everyone reading this wants a good paying , secure job with benefits and fair treatment. How is taking those kinds of jobs from others going to get you a better standard of living? Closing those plants and laying off those people puts more people on the street looking for jobs like yours and possibly willing to do it for less. So how secure would your job be then? And it won't stop there. It will become a feeding frenzy for the bottom dwellers and nothing less. Stop dragging people down because of the jobs they have and you don't. That doesn't solve a thing. Our tax dollars are paying for things a lot worse than keeping some Automotive companies afloat, but are you crying about that?

Lionview 05:42:05 PM Feb 17 2009

Wachup2 Those salaried folks are taking deeper cuts not because they want to for the sake of the company, but because they have no representation or say so. Being non-union gives them no voice or choice in the matter. Management throws the take it or leave it at them with no remorse. Their are no heroes in the salaried ranks. By the way, my taxes are helping to pay Obama's wages as well as those Senators that still think Ford is building the Model A, and I want my money back.

Lionview 05:35:29 PM Feb 17 2009

Wachup2 ....If you don't want to pay those union wages that make up less than 10% of the cars cost, then just walk to your minimum wage job. Do you have the same complaint regarding the workers for the transplant companies and their wages in the vehicle cost? They make roughly $28-29 an hour. Even though they are non-union, they too make more per hour than you likely do. So don't buy their product either. In fact, stick with your tricycle, it's cheaper!

Marchogrouchwnw 05:31:08 PM Feb 17 2009

222

Lionview 05:26:47 PM Feb 17 2009

Kr2sd obviously has no higher goals in life but to just survive. You don't want a better wage? You don't need health care benefits? You don't want vacation days and sick days right? No, you're just content with what you've got in your $8-10 an hour job and you want all of us to buy into that. If you could have those benefits and wagesthat union employees have you would take them in a heartbeat. But since you don't have them , you don't want anyone else to have them either. How sad is that?

Wachup2 05:05:39 PM Feb 17 2009

Why is it that the taxpayer bailout of GM and Chrysler goes to pay those exorbitant wages and benefits of the unionized workers. I read that the salaried folks are taking deeper cuts in pay and benefits than the unionized workers. That taxpayer money goes to pay those high wages, benefits, and legacy costs that us taxpayers had nothing to do with. We buy the car, pay those wages of the union workers and salaried employees, then put more money into the bottomless pit the UAW perpetuates. They will cut their noses off to spite their face. The union trys so hard to change to topic to corporate greed. OK. There is corporate greed and there is union greed too. Neuter them all. Taxpayers are tired of being fleeced by these practices of the greedy and the union greedy.

INOSHISHI8 05:04:25 PM Feb 17 2009

Cars from the past: studebacker. packard, hudson, nash, ksiser and frazer are all gone. No one bailed them out and the American people should not bail out this bunch. So what if the big three also go the same way. There will be others to replace them.

1 - 10 of 1700
1700 comments

Add your own Comments

Interest Rates

TypeCurrentAPR
30 Yr Fixed Mtg5.16%5.39%
5/1 ARM4.32%4.24%
$30K HELOC5.82%0.00%
36 Month New Car Loan7.20%0.00%
1 Yr CD1.59%1.60%

Headlines From AOL Money & Finance Partners