Most Expensive Celebrity
Baby Pix
Previous-
AP
What magazines are willing to pay for snaps of private moments from weddings to births has skyrocketed. Entrepreneurial celebrities, who step in to maintain control of -- and profit from -- their exposure, only add to the mix. Here are the most expensive baby pictures that sold for more than $500,000, not adjusted for inflation.
· Article: Most Expensive Celebrity Baby Pix
Next: Most Expensive Baby Photo -
No. 1: Max and Emme
Celeb Parents: Jenifer Lopez and Marc Anthony
People magazine
March 2008
Reported Price Tag: $6 million
· More on Max and Emme
Next: Shiloh Nouvel -
No. 2: Shiloh Nouvel
Celeb Parents: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt
People magazine
June 2006
Reported Price Tag: $4.1 million
· More on Shiloh Nouvel
Next: Pax Thien -
No. 3: TIE -- Pax Thien (post-adoption)
Celeb Parents: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt
People magazine
March 2007
Reported Price Tag: $2 million
· More on Pax Thien
Next: Dannielynn -
No. 3: TIE -- Dannielynn
Celeb Parents: Anna Nicole Smith and Larry Birkhead
April 2007
OK! Magazine
Reported Price Tag: $2 million
· More on Dannielynn
Next: Max -
No. 5: Max
Celeb Parents: Christina Aguilera and Jordan Bratman
People magazine
February 2008
Reported Price Tag: $1.5 million
· More on Max
· See All Celeb Babies
More on AOL: Young Billionaires -
Getty Images
Also on AOL:
Young BillionairesAs part of Forbes' 22nd annual World's Billionaires list, we take a look at some of this year's youngest members.
Click through our gallery for a glimpse of 10 individuals who are wealthy beyond their years. See what they are worth and how they obtained their fortunes.
Gallery: 10 Billionaires 35 and Under
More on AOL: Unknown Billionaires -
Cassandra Shie, AOL
Also on AOL:
Unknown BillionairesMad money does not always equal fame. These folks manage to skirt the public eye despite their billions. We're not talking about famous and reclusive. We're talking about being flat-out unknown among the masses.
Gallery: Richest People You've Never Heard Of
Next: More Special Features -
More in Money & Finance:
Rich & Single
This year 110 unattached men, including singles, divorcees and widowers, with an average net worth of $4.1 billion, made Forbes' 22nd annual ranking of the World's Billionaires.
From that elite group of men, Forbes selected 10 of the most eligible to profile. Click through our gallery to see their top picks.
Billionaire Bachelors
More Money & Lifestyle FeaturesAOL Money & Finance:
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Financial Crisis
- Madoff Scandal
- DailyFinance
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
Our Most Popular Features
Recent Comments
RockyMtnNightowl 12:13:44 AM May 01 2008
I don't care who you are OR even how much money you have, NO ONE and I mean no one picture and especially baby pictures should ever be worth any amount of dollars. It's just a simple, regular snap shot photo that someone took. Afterall does that mean I should start charging millions of dollars for my photos? Huh? Anyone who would consider doing something so stupid, foolish, dumb,etc needs to think of spending that money on more important things in the world and not on some picture. How about helping an animal or even a homeless shelter. What about helping to protect our children, environment, wildlife, oceans, trees, forests, animals. Something's are a whole lot more important than a picture.
Nanny2Lexxi 08:29:46 PM Apr 30 2008
Exploitation of children is ugly. It doesn't matter who does it or why. I wonder how these adorable little ones will feel when they grow up and learn that their photos were sold for big bucks instead of shared freely because the parents were proud to show them off. Just my opinion so I don't need any feedback filled with profanity, racists comments, religious fanaticism, etc.
Bdlee747 08:19:02 PM Apr 30 2008
I WOULD NOT TAKE THEM IF THE WERE FEE, BIG DEAL ALL BABIES R PRETTY MINE WAS LOL
Michlady60 08:14:33 PM Apr 30 2008
these people should be ashamed of themself...not so much angelina , but those other ones...its just sick, when we have people in the U.S starving and they are getting all this money for a picture.
HyTil 08:09:43 PM Apr 30 2008
Unwed...more m$$$y than G-d, and for this more m$$$y is thrown at them to show off their lack of morals!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GRADEK4MSKERN 07:57:57 PM Apr 30 2008
I really don't care for brad pitt or angelina jolie and I think its ridiculous that any one would rake in money off of their baby pictures. How ridiculous. Their baby is no cuter than anyone elses and not anymore special.
Venjamor 07:50:57 PM Apr 30 2008
you welcome conerned citizen sparrow52 lol yep to many ignorance in our own country .(DUH)which way did he go which way did he go george lol
LittleSparrow52 07:49:48 PM Apr 30 2008
CRESULTS 4 U - would you go ahead and share your baby's pic with all of us for free - now you are a true humanitarian - lol
LittleSparrow52 07:44:56 PM Apr 30 2008
Venjamor - thank you for your comment - finally someone who sees the meaning of what i said - tooooo many in need here - take care of our own and then share what we have - don't desert those in need in your own home land
Venjamor 07:40:14 PM Apr 30 2008
sparrow52 i agree ,take care of those in need not in want espeacially in your own back yard first.
