Markets
U.S. open in 4 hrs, 43 mins
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Madoff Scandal
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
Time Warner to Spin Off AOL Unit
By RACHEL METZ
, AP
NEW YORK (May 28) - Time Warner Inc. is dumping AOL after spending nearly a decade trying to build a new-age media empire only to wind up in a weaker position than when the marriage began.
The divorce, announced Thursday, will spin out AOL as a separate company run by former Google Inc. advertising executive Tim Armstrong. He was hired in March to try to restore the luster to a brand once known as America Online.
Although AOL has been eclipsed by Google and other Internet stars, Armstrong still can try to build on a wide-reaching online ad network as well as AOL's Web sites, which remain a relatively big draw.
Time Warner owns 95 percent of AOL and will buy out Google's 5 percent stake during the third quarter for an undisclosed amount. From there, AOL — which has about 7,000 employees — will be spun off into a separate publicly traded company around the end of the year.
"For AOL, becoming a standalone company will give it more focus and strategic flexibility," Time Warner's chief executive, Jeff Bewkes, said at Time Warner's annual shareholder meeting Thursday in New York.
Meanwhile, with AOL jettisoned, Time Warner will focus on movies, cable TV networks such as HBO and CNN, and publishing magazines such as Time, People and Sports Illustrated.
The $147 billion deal in which AOL bought Time Warner in 2001 epitomized the mind-boggling wealth created during the dot-com boom and quickly became one of the worst corporate combinations in history. In 2002 and 2003, Time Warner absorbed nearly $100 billion in charges to account for the rapidly diminishing value of the combined company (which today sports a market value of just $27 billion.) Time Warner even dropped AOL from its corporate name.
AOL once defined the Web for millions of people. But much of its original revenue came from providing dial-up access, a business that peaked for AOL in 2002 at 26.7 million subscribers, back when the company stuffed free trial CDs in magazines and mailboxes. The march of broadband ate away at the business, and AOL had just 6.3 million dial-up subscribers at the end of the last quarter.
The decline undercut one of the main premises for the AOL-Time Warner deal, which was that Time Warner's media content would be enhanced by AOL's Internet reach.
AOL responded to the trend by giving away most of its services, like e-mail, to drive traffic to its free, ad-supported Web sites. It also laid off thousands of employees to try to streamline.
But after a few strong quarters, ad growth slowed and then began declining. AOL's Platform-A business places ads on sites all over the Web, not just ones run by AOL. Yet that reach hasn't mattered enough: Both Yahoo and Google mine bigger profits from their advertising businesses.
Although AOL's operations make money, its operating profit of $150 million in the first quarter marked a 47 percent drop from the same period in 2008.
Meanwhile, AOL's Web sites, which include celebrity gossip site TMZ and tech blog Engadget, averaged 106 million unique U.S. visitors each month during the first quarter, according to comScore Media Metrix — a drop from 110 million visitors in the first three months of 2008. The company ranks fourth for traffic, with Google, Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft Corp. coming in first, second and third.
With Time Warner and AOL casting about for solutions, AOL and Yahoo discussed a potential partnership in recent years. Yahoo — struggling through a massive reorganization and leadership change of its own — considered taking over some or all of AOL, but the on-again, off-again talks never got anywhere.
Turnover has been a problem for AOL, too: Armstrong is the company's third CEO since 2006, and he recently named a former Google colleague, Jeff Levick, as the fourth person to head Platform-A since it was formed in 2007. Bewkes said that after the spinoff, AOL will be able to use its own stock to help hire and keep better, more committed employees.
Google's investment shows just how far AOL has fallen in the past few years. When Google agreed to pay $1 billion for its 5 percent stake in late 2005, the investment pegged AOL's market value at $20 billion. In January, Google estimated its investment had plunged by more than 70 percent, leaving AOL with a market value of about $5.5 billion.
Time Warner shares fell 16 cents to $23.16 in afternoon trading.
Frederick Moran, an analyst at The Benchmark Co., said investors and Time Warner shareholders will be pleased by the spinoff news because AOL has acted "almost like an anchor" on Time Warner's stock over the last few years.
Time Warner also recently spun out Time Warner Cable, which provides cable TV and broadband Internet access. Since then, Time Warner Cable's stock has risen 26 percent — but Time Warner shares have been essentially flat.
Ted Leonsis, an executive who retired from AOL in late 2006, said the decision to spin off AOL emphasizes a shift from seeking size and scale — two attributes that were in vogue 10 years ago — to a focus on being nimble and innovative.
"I'm thrilled for the employees and I don't see any other plan, so while it's a great decision it was an inevitable decision," he said.
Former Time Warner CEO Gerald Levin, who was instrumental in AOL's takeover, recently declined to comment about the looming breakup. Levin now works as director of a rehabilitation center in Southern California.
AOL co-founder Steve Case, the other main architect of the 2001 deal, wrote Thursday on the short-messaging site Twitter that he is glad to see the breakup. He said it "has been a long, tortuous journey" and now is "time to open a new chapter."
AP Business Writer Andrew Vanacore in New York and AP Technology Writer Michael Liedtke in San Francisco contributed to this report.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-05-28 08:12:03
COMMENTS ( 79 )
nbarquet
2:54PM Jul 23 2009
I am extremely disappointed with the deceitful practices of AOL. After being a customer for 13+ years, I have just learned that they no longer charge for their services. I called them today and instead of listening to my concern and answering my question, the customer service person try to sell me yet another package. Insulting, condescending and manipulative is how I would describe AOLs customer service. If you know where I could file a formal complain against AOL and its deceitful practices, please let me know.
REPLY
RATING
(0 RATINGS)
JFSRULES
10:56AM May 30 2009
As if Republicans are honest??? What a laugh!
REPLY
RATING
(0 RATINGS)
JFSRULES
10:54AM May 30 2009
Of course I got something to say!!! Some comments are right, I canceled AOL after 8 years of use when they transferred my call to some foreign land, most likely India, and I became so upset the way they communicated my concerns. Plus the accounts were not free, we had to pay, duh! iIt does not take a genius to figure out where people will go instead. AOL are a bunch of idiots.
REPLY
RATING
(0 RATINGS)
UhappyUser
10:53AM May 29 2009
AOL is so entertaining. I log on and then begin repeatedly saying, "AOL SUCKS - AOL SUCKS - AOL SUCKS" (until the time I log off. I leave with this good feeling all over my body, "I have been 'optimized' ". I say, file chapter 11 and get the hell out of the industry. (BTW - you suspended my chat room for apparent violations of your Terms of Service, and I did not even get the courtesy of an email telling me that. I find that incredible. I am clueless as to what I may have done. It's stuff like that which makes me hope you are no longer in existence. To the Board of Directors: Your account has been been cancelled for multiple violations of your own Terms of Service. YOU NAZI BASTARDS!
REPLY
RATING
(0 RATINGS)
TOKLEYWHIT
7:09AM May 29 2009
I bought my first PC ************ started my AOL membership. I felt it was the premier ISP at that time. They have failed to keep up with the times. Their browser totally sucks. The only reason I maintain my free membership is because so many people know my e mail address.
REPLY
RATING
(0 RATINGS)