Markets
U.S. open in 8 hrs, 27 mins
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Madoff Scandal
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
The Buying Behavior of Substantial Minorities of Public Is Influenced by Environmental Attitudes – If the Price is Right
Many People Prefer to Buy Locally Grown, or Organic, Produce and “Green” Products from Environmentally-Friendly Companies, But Not If They Are Much More Expensive
Business Wire
It’s quite popular for people to claim that they care about the
environment. In fact many millions of people - from 18% to 39% of all
adults - say that their purchasing behavior and other interactions with
companies is sometimes influenced by environmental factors. However, in
reality, only a very small minority is willing to pay substantially more
for “green” products or goods produced by environmentally-friendly
companies.
These are some of the results of
The
Harris Poll
®
of 3,110 adults, surveyed online
between July 7 and September 8, 2009 by
Harris
Interactive
®.
Over 30% of adults say that they often or always purchase locally grown
products or seek out and are willing to pay more for “green” products.
And a quarter of all adults say that environmental issues are very
important to them when deciding what products to buy. But only a few
people seek out and buy green products if they have to pay a lot more
for them (2%) or say the cost doesn’t matter (3%).
Some of the findings of this Harris Poll include:
- 26% of all adults say that environmental issues are extremely or very important to them when deciding what products or services to buy;
- 17% say that environmental issues are extremely or very important to them when deciding what company to work for;
- Fully 32% say they seek out ‘green” products and are willing to pay at least a little more for “green” products;
- However, only a few do not consider cost (3%) or are willing to pay a lot more (2%) for them;
- 18% of all adults prefer to do business with a “green” company.
These findings come from a much larger survey by Harris Interactive
which asked many other questions about environmental issues, attitudes
and behaviors. The survey also found that most people were taking some
action, however modest, to limit their use of electricity, water or
gasoline. While two-thirds (67%) of these people said that they were
doing this to benefit the environment, over half (55%) said that they
were doing this to save money.
This Harris Poll divided the adult population into four segments based
on how they described themselves in response to
four
different questions. These segments went from the least to the most
“green” and, as the tables here show, the replies of the four segments
to virtually all of the questions are dramatically different. The “most
green” segment, 22% of all adults, are far more likely to adopt all of
the environmentally-friendly activities. The “least green” are extremely
unlikely to adopt any of them.
For example, fully 68% of the “most green” segment are willing to pay at
least a little more for green products. Only 3% of the “least green” are
willing to do so.
So what?
The most important conclusion to be drawn from these findings is that
“green marketing” surely appeals to substantial numbers of consumers.
Everything
else being equal, many millions of people would prefer to buy
products and services that are “green” or are produced by
environmentally-friendly companies. However, if “green” products cost
significantly more than less “green” products, relatively few people
will buy them. When push comes to shove, in these economic times
especially, price usually trumps environmental factors.
|
TABLE 1
|
|||||||||||
|
HOW GREEN-NESS INFLUENCES PURCHASING BEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDES TO
COMPANIES
|
|||||||||||
|
(Summary from 8 Questions)
|
|||||||||||
|
Base: All adults
|
|||||||||||
|
All
Adults
|
Green-ness | ||||||||||
|
Least
Green
|
Most
Green
|
||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||
| Agree that “Going Green is just a marketing tactic” | 22 | 33 | 21 | 17 | 16 | ||||||
| “I prefer to do business with ‘green’ companies” | 18 | * | 5 | 14 | 60 | ||||||
|
Environmental issues very important when deciding:
- “Which products or services you purchase”
- “What company or business you work for or apply for a job at”
|
26
17
|
4
5
|
11
6
|
28
17
|
67
43
|
||||||
| “Seek out green products and willing to pay more for them” | 32 | 3 | 20 | 40 | 68 | ||||||
| “Often/always purchase locally grown produce” | 39 | 20 | 31 | 42 | 65 | ||||||
|
“Boycotted a business . . . because of their environmental or
conservation practices (or lack thereof)” |
6 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 15 | ||||||
|
TABLE 2
|
|||||||||||
|
INTEREST IN PAYING MORE FOR GREEN PRODUCTS
|
|||||||||||
|
“Which of the following statements best describes your perspective
on environmentally-friendly products or
services?” |
|||||||||||
|
Base: All adults
|
|||||||||||
|
All
Adults
|
Green-ness | ||||||||||
|
Least
Green
|
Most
Green
|
||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||
| SEEK OUT GREEN PRODUCTS AND WILLING TO PAY EXTRA (NET) | 32 | 3 | 20 | 40 | 68 | ||||||
| I seek out green products, no matter the additional cost | 3 | * | 1 | 3 | 10 | ||||||
| I seek out green products even if I have to pay a lot extra | 2 | - | * | 2 | 7 | ||||||
| I seek out green products even if I have to pay a little extra | 26 | 3 | 19 | 35 | 50 | ||||||
|
SEEK OUT GREEN PRODUCTS BUT NOT WILLING TO PAY
EXTRA (NET) |
45 | 43 | 57 | 47 | 28 | ||||||
| I seek out green products as long as the cost is the same | 29 | 21 | 37 | 34 | 22 | ||||||
|
I seek out green products only if they save me at least a
little money |
9 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 4 | ||||||
|
I seek out green products only if they save me a lot of
money |
7 | 12 | 9 | 4 | 2 | ||||||
|
I DO NOT SEEK OUT GREEN PRODUCTS, NO MATTER THE
COST OR SAVINGS |
24 | 54 | 23 | 14 | 4 | ||||||
|
TABLE 3
|
|||||||||||
|
WHY PEOPLE HAVE BEHAVED IN ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY WAYS
|
|||||||||||
|
“For which of the following reasons, if any, do you engage in
these activities or behavior?”
|
|||||||||||
|
Base: Adults who have done green activities in past year
|
|||||||||||
|
All
Adults
|
Green-ness | ||||||||||
|
Least
Green |
|
|
Most
Green |
||||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
||||||||
| To benefit the environment | 67 | 38 | 64 | 77 | 88 | ||||||
| To save money | 55 | 55 | 54 | 55 |
56
|
||||||
|
To take advantage of a ‘green’ government tax credit (e.g., for
purchasing a hybrid car, making certain home improvements) |
7 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 12 | ||||||
| To set a good example for others (e.g., friends, children) | 47 | 23 | 41 | 57 | 67 | ||||||
| To make a statement | 13 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 27 | ||||||
| To reduce clutter in my home | 49 | 42 | 47 | 52 | 52 | ||||||
|
Out of habit (e.g., it’s how you were raised, or you’ve always
done so) |
40 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 49 | ||||||
| Because it is required by law (e.g., recycling) | 14 | 16 | 13 | 15 | 10 | ||||||
|
TABLE 4
|
||||
|
HOW “GREEN-NESS” WAS DEFINED
|
||||
|
“To what extent, if any, does each of the following describe you?”
|
||||
|
Base: All adults
|
||||
|
Describes Very Well/
Completely
|
||||
| I am environmentally-conscious | 30% | |||
| I am a conservationist | 17% | |||
| I am an environmentalist | 13% | |||
| I am ‘green’ | 13% | |||
|
DEFINITION OF “GREEN-NESS”
|
||||
|
“Green-ness” was defined on the number of those replies people
gave, as follows:
|
||||
| 1 “LEAST GREEN” | Average score = 1.00-1.50 | |||
| 2 | Average score = 1.75-2.25 | |||
| 3 | Average score = 2.50-3.00 | |||
| 4 “MOST GREEN” | Average score = 3.25-5.00 | |||
The Harris Poll
®
#120, October 23,
2009
By Humphrey Taylor, Chairman, The Harris Poll
By Humphrey Taylor, Chairman, The Harris Poll
Methodology
This
Harris Poll was conducted online within the United States
July 7 and September 8, 2009, among 3,110 adults (aged 18 and over).
Figures for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region and household
income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their
actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was
also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability
sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often
not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage
error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question
wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments.
Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words “margin of error” as they
are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible
sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted,
random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical
because no published polls come close to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have
agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been
weighted to reflect the composition of the adult population. Because the
sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris
Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be
calculated.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the
National Council on Public Polls.
About Harris Interactive
Harris Interactive is a global leader in custom market research. With a
long and rich history in multimodal research, powered by our science and
technology, we assist clients in achieving business results. Harris
Interactive serves clients globally through our North American, European
and Asian offices and a network of independent market research firms.
For more information, please visit
www.harrisinteractive.com
Copyright Business Wire 2009
2009-10-23 05:00:00
COMMENTS ( 0 )