Markets
U.S. open in 3 hrs, 15 mins
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Financial Crisis
- Madoff Scandal
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
Steep Decline in U.S. Listings Attributed to Existing Market Structure
Call for Reform to Stimulate the Economy and Spur Job Creation
Business Wire
A study released today by Grant Thornton LLP,
A Wake-Up Call for
America, demonstrates that market structure changes implemented
beginning in the late 1990s are leading to a dramatic long-term decline
in the number of publicly listed companies in the United States.
According to the study, SEC actions over recent decades have encouraged
the development of markets that favor the most technologically
sophisticated traders. The rise of high-frequency trading is the natural
consequence of regulations designed to increase efficiency, but those
same regulations have tended to undermine market support for small,
innovative companies.
“Our ‘one-size-fits-all’ market structure has added liquidity to large
cap stocks, but has created a black hole for small cap listed
companies,” said David Weild, Capital Markets Advisor at Grant Thornton
LLP and former vice chairman of NASDAQ. “Wall Street’s very nature has
been substantially transformed.”
“This important study demonstrates convincingly further cause for
concern about rules that encourage high-frequency trading to thrive, but
perhaps have undermined one of Wall Street’s most important purposes: to
provide the infrastructure for smaller, growing companies in the United
States to gain access to the public markets to facilitate further growth
and innovation,” said Senator Ted Kaufman (D-Del.). “The Grant Thornton
study is a call to action. U.S. innovation policy must include an
intelligent review of our U.S. equity markets, so that Wall Street once
again helps innovative small companies to succeed.”
Known in the 1990s as the “Four Horsemen,” the investment banks that
once catered to emerging-growth companies are gone. Today the market is
dominated by firms that buy and sell in milliseconds, using automated
algorithms that have no interest in the fundamental valuations
underlying stocks. They include proprietary trading, statistical
arbitrage hedge funds, and automated market makers.
The result? Investors, issuers and the economy have all been harmed.
Wall Street is now fixated on trading profits and has abandoned
investments in quality sell-side analysis, underwriting and sales
support — the infrastructure necessary to support and create value in
small cap stocks. Policymakers must recognize that the structure and
regulatory framework guiding U.S. equity markets has become not only an
important issue for investors due to fairness concerns, but also a
critical component of U.S. economic policy that is affecting our
economy’s ability to innovate, create jobs and grow.
The decline in the number of new listings began before the technology
bubble burst a decade ago — before the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley in
2002 — and has continued through bull and bear markets. The number of
U.S. listed companies has fallen by more than 22 percent since 1991, or
53 percent when calculating in inflation-adjusted GDP growth. In
contrast, exchanges in Asia are adding new listings faster than GDP
growth rates.
According to the study, 360 new listings per year — a number not
approached since 2000 — are required by the United States simply to
replace the number of listed companies that are lost every year.
Moreover, 520 new listings per year are needed to grow the U.S. listed
markets roughly in line with GDP growth. In reality, the U.S. has
averaged fewer than 166 IPOs per year since 2001, with only 54 in 2008.
Believed to be the first of its kind, the study was conducted by David
Weild and Edward Kim, Capital Markets Advisors at Grant Thornton LLP,
using
data from a number of sources, including the World Federation of
Exchanges, and from direct interaction with major stock exchanges.
“This study confirms that America’s slipping global competitiveness in
the capital markets is rooted in long-term structural problems, with
devastating consequences for growth capital formation in the U.S.,” said
Pascal Levensohn, Founder and Managing Partner of Levensohn Venture
Partners, Board Member of the National Venture Capital Association
(NVCA), and member of the Council on Foreign Relations. “The inability
for emerging growth companies to access U.S. public equity capital by
completing IPOs below $50 million inhibits job creation and hurts
American entrepreneurs more than any other group. If we can’t repair the
bridge into public markets, the next generation of innovative private
enterprises — starved for long-term risk capital in the U.S. — will
continue to move to non-U.S. emerging innovation hotspots, where
startups are nurtured through attractive capital incentives.”
Barry Silbert, Founder and CEO of SecondMarket, the industry leader in
private company stock transactions, said “The growth and development of
a robust private market is critical to creating a better alternative and
viable bridge to the public market. The time from company formation to
IPO is now so long — nearly 10 years — that it undermines the
development of small businesses, entrepreneurship and American global
competitiveness.”
“Today, our stock markets are increasingly structured to favor
computer-driven trading interests at the expense of long-term investors
and the U.S. taxpayer,” said Grant Thornton’s Kim. “We need a regulatory
framework that guides Wall Street to help small companies with their
capital formation needs, not just build faster and more powerful trading
algorithms.”
| Percent change | Percent change | |||||||||||||||
| Number of listings | 1991-2008 | Number of listings | Peak Year - 2008 | |||||||||||||
| GDP | GDP | |||||||||||||||
| 1991 | 2008 | Actual | Adjusted | Year | Peak | Actual | Adjusted | |||||||||
| NASDAQ | 4,094 | 2,952 | (27.9)% | (56.2)% | 1996 | 5,556 | (46.9)% | (62.2)% | ||||||||
| NYSE | 1,989 | 1,963 | (1.3)% | (40.1)% | 1998 | 2,592 | (24.3)% | (43.0)% | ||||||||
| AMEX | 860 | 486 | (43.5)% | (65.7)% | 1993 | 889 | (45.3)% | (64.8)% | ||||||||
| ALL | 6,943 | 5,401 | (22.2)% | (52.8)% | 1997 | 8,823 | (38.8)% | (54.5)% | ||||||||
|
Source: Capital Markets Advisory Partners, World Federation of
Exchanges, individual stock exchanges, USDA Economic Research
Service (GDP in 2005 US$). Excluding funds.
|
||||||||||||||||
Recommended Changes
The Grant Thornton study calls for immediate action and includes
recommendations on how to improve both public and private stock markets
in ways that provide investors and issuers with more choice. It argues
that the opportunity cost of poor primary capital formation is so
extreme that the U.S. needs significant improvements to both the public
and private markets to restore U.S. competitiveness. Recommendations
include:
- Alternative Public Market Segment: A public market solution that provides an economic model that supports the “value components” (research, sales and capital commitment) in the marketplace. It would establish a new, parallel market segment that benefits from a fixed spread and commission structure.
- Enhancements to the Private Market: A private market solution that enables the creation of a qualified investor marketplace — consisting of both institutional investors and large accredited investors — that allows issuers to defer many of the costs of accessing private capital as a precursor to becoming a public company. This market would serve as an important bridge to an IPO, notably in improving the market for 144A PIPO (pre-IPO) transactions that require an issuer to list publicly in the future.
Grant Thornton urges Congress and the SEC to hold immediate hearings to
understand why the U.S. markets have failed to keep up with foreign
markets and to craft solutions quickly — solutions that, together with
thoughtful oversight, will advance the U.S. economy, create high-quality
jobs, improve U.S. competitiveness, increase the tax base and decrease
the U.S. budget deficit, all without major expenditures by the U.S.
government.
View the full study at:
www.GrantThornton.com/WakeupCall
and urge Congress to act. Sign up for future updates and studies at
www.GrantThornton.com/subscribe
and select the Capital Markets Series.
About Grant Thornton LLP
Grant Thornton LLP is the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton
International Ltd, one of the six leading global accounting, tax and
business advisory organizations. Through member firms in more than 80
countries, including 50 offices in the United States, the partners and
employees of Grant Thornton member firms provide personalized attention
and the highest quality service to public and private clients around the
globe. Visit Grant Thornton LLP at
www.GrantThornton.com.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available:
http://www.businesswire.com/cgi-bin/mmg.cgi?eid=6094135&lang=en
Copyright Business Wire 2009
2009-11-09 08:00:00
COMMENTS ( 0 )