Markets
U.S. open in 13 hrs, 23 mins
BUSINESS NEWS
- Market News
- Earnings
- Recalls
- Recession Watch
- Tech News
- Financial Crisis
- Madoff Scandal
- BloggingStocks
- Luxist
- Money Videos
INVESTING
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- Stock Ticker
- Currencies
- Portfolio
- Stock Screener
- Broker Center
- Mutual Fund Center
- ETF Center
- Money
- 24/7 Wall St.
- Financial Glossary
PERSONAL FINANCE AT WALLETPOP
- Bargains
- Banking
- Budget
- Calculators
- College Finance
- Community
- Credit
- Deals
- Debt
- Economizer
- Food
- Home
- Fraud
- Insurance
- Interest Rates
- Loans
- Mortgages
- Real Estate
- Recalls
- Recession
- Retirement
- Saving
- Simplification
- Specials
- Taxes
SMALL BUSINESS
Pearl Meyer & Partners Say on Pay Survey Suggests Few Companies Preparing for Say on Pay
Even Companies Taking Steps are Deferring the Most Difficult Measures
Business Wire
Even as momentum continues to build to require a shareholder vote on
executive pay at all publicly-listed firms, few companies have taken
steps to prepare for Say on Pay or plan to do so in the next six months,
according to a new survey by independent compensation consultancy Pearl
Meyer & Partners released today at the National Association of Corporate
Directors Corporate Governance Conference.
This past summer, the U.S. House of Representatives approved the
Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009,
which would require an annual, non-binding advisor shareholder vote on
pay. Most observers expect the U.S. Senate to also approve the
legislation.
Yet just 7% of the 231 survey participants in Pearl Meyer & Partners’
online
Say On Pay Survey said their company is “very concerned”
about such a vote, and another 35% indicated they were only “somewhat”
concerned. Moreover, more than two-thirds (66%) said their company
hasn’t taken any steps to prepare for a Say on Pay vote and only 35%
plan to do so in the next six months. Survey respondents were mostly
compensation committee members, top human resources professionals, and
members of the compensation group.
“Public companies are surprisingly reticent to address the very real
likelihood of mandatory Say on Pay votes,” said Mike Enos, Ph.D.,
Managing Director of Pearl Meyer & Partners. “Although many believe such
a requirement will not take effect the until 2011 proxy season,
decisions being made now regarding 2010 compensation practices could
potentially be the subject of Say on Pay votes in 2011.”
Three-quarters of respondents predicted shareholders would approve a Say
on Pay vote if it was held. “However, our experience with TARP clients
suggests that proxy advisor groups have and will continue to recommend
‘no’ votes for some companies,” Enos said. “The first shareholder vote
against pay is more likely a question of ‘when,’ not ‘if.’”
Companies Focus on Relatively Simple Steps, Rather than Tackling More
Difficult Issues
Companies that have begun preparing for Say on Pay are most focused on
steps that are easily achievable or are already part of their annual
compensation review. Such common activities included:
- Reviewing proxy compensation disclosure and analysis (CD&A) and related tables to ensure executive compensation disclosure is clear, complete and not subject to misinterpretation (82%)
- Keeping abreast of the results of Say on Pay proposals at other companies (81%)
- Reviewing market benchmarking practices, particularly with respect to selection of appropriate peer groups (69%)
- Conducting analyses to ensure there is a strong link between executive pay and performance (62%)
- Identifying any perceived poor pay practices in their executive compensation philosophy and program design (57%)
On the other hand, only 35% of respondents who indicated they were
actively preparing for Say on Pay said they inquired into their
institutional shareholders’ general views on Say on Pay or whether those
investors are likely to follow the recommendations of proxy advisory
firms. Additionally, about one-third (30%) of all respondents said they
were unfamiliar with the overall voting guidelines of proxy advisory
groups. “By failing to anticipate the attitudes and policies of
institutional shareholders and proxy advisory firms, companies risk
being blind-sided at the last moment,” Enos said.
The quality of shareholder communications also has received little
attention. Only 22% of respondents who indicated their company has taken
steps to prepare for Say on Pay reported having in place an effective
shareholder communications strategy, which would include a process for
gathering feedback from institutional shareholders, unions and/or other
constituencies on executive compensation programs.
About the Survey
Pearl Meyer & Partners’
“Say on Pay” survey took place in
July and August 2009 and examined views on advisory shareholder votes
across a broad range of industries and organization sizes. A total of
231 respondents participated in the survey, mainly compensation
committee members, top human resources professionals, and members of the
compensation group.
The full survey is available at
www.pearlmeyer.com/sayonpaysurvey.
About Pearl Meyer & Partners
For 20 years, Pearl Meyer & Partners (
www.pearlmeyer.com)
has served as a trusted independent advisor to Boards and their senior
management in the areas of compensation governance, strategy and program
design. The firm provides comprehensive solutions to complex
compensation challenges for companies ranging from the Fortune 500 to
not-for-profits as well as emerging high-growth companies. These
organizations rely on Pearl Meyer & Partners to develop programs that
align rewards with long-term business goals to create value for all
stakeholders: shareholders, executives, and employees. The firm
maintains offices in New York, Atlanta, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago,
Houston, Los Angeles and San Jose.
Copyright Business Wire 2009
2009-10-20 10:17:00
COMMENTS ( 0 )