Markets

U.S. open in 7 hrs, 44 mins
10,058.64
150.25
 
1.52%
2,150.87
24.82
 
1.17%
1,070.52
13.78
 
1.30%
97.781
-0.6562
 
0.67%
5,111.84
19.51
 
0.38%
9,963.99
31.09
 
0.31%
19,827.17
36.89
 
0.19%
0.0138
 
1.01%
0.54
 
0.61%
1,076.40
-0.80
 
0.07%
73.46
-0.29
 
0.39%
Bookmark and Share

Senate Votes to Start Health Care Debate

AP
posted: 80 DAYS 5 HOURS AGO
Text SizeAAA
WASHINGTON (Nov. 21) -- Invoking the name of Edward M. Kennedy, Democrats united Saturday night to push historic health care legislation past a key Senate hurdle over the opposition of Republicans eager to inflict a punishing defeat on President Barack Obama. There was not a vote to spare.
The 60-39 vote cleared the way for a bruising, full-scale debate beginning after Thanksgiving on the legislation, which is designed to extend coverage to roughly 31 million who lack it, crack down on insurance company practices that deny or dilute benefits and curtail the growth of spending on medical care nationally.
The spectator galleries were full for the unusual Saturday night showdown, and applause broke out briefly when the vote was announced. In a measure of the significance of the moment, senators sat quietly in their seats, standing only when they were called upon to vote.
Republican Sen. George Voinovich of Ohio missed the vote.
In the final minutes of a daylong debate, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused Republicans of trying to stifle a debate the nation needed.
"Imagine if, instead of debating whether to abolish slavery, instead of debating whether giving women and minorities the right to vote, those who disagreed had muted discussion and killed any vote," he said.
The Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said the vote was anything but procedural — casting it as a referendum on the bill itself, which he said would raise taxes, cut Medicare and create a "massive and unsustainable debt."
For all the drama, the result of the Saturday night showdown had been sealed a few hours earlier, when two final Democratic holdouts, Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, announced they would join in clearing the way for a full debate.
"It is clear to me that doing nothing is not an option," said Landrieu, who won $100 million in the legislation to help her state pay the costs of health care for the poor.
Lincoln, who faces a tough re-election next year, said the evening vote will "mark the beginning of consideration of this bill by the U.S. Senate, not the end."
Both stressed they were not committing in advance to vote for the bill that ultimately emerges from next month's debate. Even so, their announcements marked a major victory for Reid and the White House in a year-end drive to enact the most sweeping changes to the nation's health care system in a half-century or more.
The legislation would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide subsidies to those who couldn't afford it. Large companies could incur costs if they did not provide coverage to their workforce. The insurance industry would come under significant new regulation under the bill, which would first ease and then ban the practice of denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.
Congressional budget analysts put the legislation's cost at $979 billion over a decade and said it would reduce deficits over the same period while extending coverage to 94 percent of the eligible population.s article.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
2009-11-21 06:19:53
COMMENTS ( 184 )
Page 1 of 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>
NNevelizer
10:17PM Nov 26 2009 
Bush WAS a big spender. Billions for 9/11 victims' families. Billions for victims of Katrina, Rita, the sunami in Indonesia, etc, etc, etc, on top of two ongoing wars and all of the other "normal" things. Over GW's 8 year administration, the federal debt rose $4.9 trillion (see US governments own figures), which averages out to a little over $0.6 trillion per year. In only 10 months (1/21/09 - 11/22/09) Obama's administration has increased the federal debt another $1.4 trillion, a much higher rate than GW. Just imagine what it will be after the dems add Obama Care to that!!
REPLY RATING
(1 RATINGS)
 
Jumphigh83
7:14PM Nov 26 2009 
Looking at the "public housing projects" around here I am CERTAIN I do NOT want a "public health care option"..............
REPLY RATING
(1 RATINGS)
 
rdnck32vsy
3:34PM Nov 26 2009 
Judging from the way they talk, just about everybody in this country is strongly anti-communist. But ballots speak louder than words. Judging from the way they vote, many of these same people have swallowed the basic tenets of Marx's Communist Manifesto hook, line, and sinker. Offered as series of statements purporting to define a just society and asked to judge the true from the false, a surprising number would mark the slogan. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" as true. Overlooking the fact that while abilities are limited, needs are endless, they opt for a system in which the satisfaction of all needs is guaranteed; and confusing rights with privileges, they suffer from the delusion that such rights can be granted without an loss of personal freedom. Well, I'll tell you, comrade, it just ain't so.
REPLY RATING
(3 RATINGS)
 
stheel4
10:10AM Nov 26 2009 
The number of provisions prohibiting the rationing of health care in the bill = 0..The number of new government programs authorized by the bill = 70..the number of times the secretary of health and human services is given authority to determine or defineprovisions in the bill = 1697...Cost per word of the bill = 6.8 million..The total number of new taxes on Americans that do not buy Washington-defined health care = 8 billion..465 billion in Medicare cuts..cost of new bill = 2.5 trillion..source = www.boortz.com....now we have just one Senator from Louisianna getting a 300 million bribe to sign the bill so what did the other 59 Senators get?...and just how bad is this bill for America if Senators and our Congress all have to be payed off behind closed doors to sign a bill that they are exempt from?
REPLY RATING
(4 RATINGS)
 
Bkind7x
7:32AM Nov 26 2009 
Not having healthcare does not kill people - WHAT DOES ? not eating enough, not eating healthy or eating too much does. Also, violence and theft kills people.
REPLY RATING
(5 RATINGS)
 
Page 1 of 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR SIGN IN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.
Make a Comment
Comment
 
Download the Daily Finance iPhone Application

Headlines From AOL Money & Finance Partners

CNBC
The Big Money
Smart Money
Kiplinger.com
The street