Markets

U.S. open in 40 hrs, 53 mins
10,464.40
30.69
 
0.29%
2,176.05
6.87
 
0.32%
1,110.63
4.98
 
0.45%
100.875
0.2812
 
0.28%
5,364.81
40.85
 
0.77%
9,441.64
40.06
 
0.43%
22,611.80
188.66
 
0.84%
0.0168
 
1.12%
-1.13
 
1.28%
1,189.90
24.10
 
2.07%
77.73
1.71
 
2.25%
Bookmark and Share

Bank of America giving up Merrill deal documents

BY IEVA M. AUGSTUMS and STEPHEN BERNARD
,
AP
posted: 42 DAYS 23 HOURS AGO
Text SizeAAA
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -Bank of America Corp., giving up a months-long fight with regulators, plans to turn over documents revealing legal advice it received on its purchase of Merrill Lynch.
In a turnabout, the bank will waive attorney-client privilege that kept it from telling regulators about recommendations it received from outside attorneys over whether to disclose details to shareholders about Merrill's mounting troubles.
On Tuesday, Bank of America spokesman Larry DiRita said, "Given the pressure in multiple inquiries to provide additional insight, we've decided to waive it in this matter to get the issue behind us."
"We've got nothing to hide and are certain we did everything proper in the context of the Merrill acquisition," he added.
Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America has agreed to waive its attorney-client privilege for investigations by the New York attorney general's office, the Securities and Exchange Commission and a congressional committee, a person familiar with the bank's agreement said. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the information wasn't publicly disclosed.
The bank's change of heart, which came almost two weeks after the company announced that CEO Ken Lewis planned to retire by Dec. 31, appeared to be the company's attempt to end the controversy that followed the Merrill deal.
"The last thing you want is customers to think they are less than honest," said Michael W. Robinson, senior vice president of Levick Strategic Communications, a Washington, D.C.-based company that provides crisis management help for corporations. "What is in those documents is important, but not releasing them was far more damaging to the bank."
"They couldn't do it until Lewis said he was going to step down, and they wanted to do it ahead of earnings, and clearly the board wanted to get involved," Robinson said, referring to Bank of America's third-quarter earnings report, to be issued Friday. In September, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo subpoenaed five members of Bank of America's board as part of its investigation into the Merrill acquisition.
"If you are a board member, you really never want to have a subpoena," Robinson said. "They want to move on."
It is believed that the legal battles that followed the Merrill deal contributed to Lewis' decision to leave.
Cuomo's office is trying to determine whether Bank of America misled shareholders about $3.6 billion in bonuses paid to Merrill employees and the investment bank's mortgage lending losses, as well as whether the company failed to tell shareholders that it considered backing out of the deal before it closed on Jan. 1.
The attorney general's office and a federal judge overseeing the SEC case have questioned whether the bank knowingly hid details about the acquisition from shareholders ahead of a vote to approve the deal. Until now, the bank had declined to provide details on legal advice it received on its disclosures to shareholders.
But in a letter to Cuomo obtained by The Associated Press, Bank of America said that following a "very constructive" meeting Oct. 6 between the bank and the attorney general's office, it "reconsidered its position" with regard to waiving privilege, "in the hope of furthering a resolution."
In its letter to the attorney general's office, Bank of America said it will waive privilege with respect to communications about what bonus-related disclosures would be made in, or omitted from, the joint proxy statement issued by Bank of America and Merrill on Nov. 3, 2008, in connection with their merger. It will also waive privilege regarding Bank of America's consideration about whether to back out of the deal under a material adverse change clause, and the disclosure or nondisclosure of Merrill's 2008 fourth-quarter financial performance and potential goodwill impairment charges before the acquisition's Jan. 1 closing.
Bank of America also said in the letter it will waive privilege related to its communications with the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department and other government officials regarding federal aid in connection with the Merrill Lynch takeover.
Lewis has said he was pressured by the Treasury and Fed to complete the purchase. Bank of America agreed to acquire Merrill Lynch in a hastily arranged deal in September 2008, at the height of the financial crisis, just as Lehman Brothers was preparing to file for bankruptcy.
Bernard reported from New York.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
2009-10-13 17:47:50
COMMENTS ( 4 )
Page 1 of 1 1
popecash
This comment has been deleted.
MirrorManxkl
1:39PM Oct 13 2009 
CAN WE REALLY CUT FISCAL SPENDING TO MAKE UP FOR THESE INCREDIBLE LOSSES IN BUDGET? LOLOLOLOL....YEAH SURE......BUT IT WOULD BE EASIER TO BUST SOME FINGERS OFF INSTEAD.....

TO CUT SPENDING MEANS THAT WHAT SEMBLANCE OF CIVILIZATION WE HAVE WILL BEGIN TO LOOK LIKE THE WILD WEST WITH PEOPLE SHOOTING PEOPLE IN THE STREETS, AND ROBBERIES, AND VIOLENCE, AND DYING ON THE SIDEWALK AS IT BECOMES NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO WALK THOSE STREETS EVEN IN PLACES LIKE FIFTH AVENUE(WHICH BY WAY IS ALREADY BEGINNING TO TASTE A LITTLE INCREASE IN CRIME.)

THE FACT IS THERE IS ALMOST NO WAY, WITH SO LARGE A SOCIETY, TO ACTUALLY CUT SPENDING(IT IS IN FACT NEARLY AT BOTTOM NOW BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WHICH IS WHY SERVICES SUCK SO BAD IN THE BIG CITIES.) CUTTING ANYMORE SERVICES MEANS WE RISK BIG, AND POTENTIALLY VIOLENT REACTIONS...SOMETHING OBAMA, NOR THE CONGRESS, NOR THE PEOPLE WOULD REALLY WANT....SO THATS JUST A PIPE DREAM.
REPLY RATING
(0 RATINGS)
 
MirrorManxkl
1:33PM Oct 13 2009 
HERES AN INTERESTING QUESTION THAT I HEARD STARTED ON BLOOMBERG RADIO WITH TOM KEENE: ESSENTIALLY THE QUESTION IS THIS...WHEN WILL BERNANKE HAVE TO SAY UNCLE? WHEN WILL HE BE FORCED TO RAISE INTEREST RATES...SOME SPECIALIST GUY INSISTS THAT THE FED WILL HAVE TO RAISE RATES WHEN THE LOSSES SHOW UP ON THEIR BALANCE SHEETS...I DONT THINK SO...I THINK BERNANKE CAN JUST KEEP PRINTING SPENDING AND LENDING ALL HE WANTS NO MATTER WHAT SHOWS UP ON HIS BALANCE SHEET.

NO I THINK THE FINGERS GET TWISTED AND ULTIMATELY BROKEN BY THE INTEREST RATE ENFORCER WHEN IT BECOMES CLEAR THAT WE HAVE ENTERED A HYPER INFLATIONARY PERIOD!!!! AS IT BECOMES CLEAR THAT CURRENCIES ARE WORTH NOTHING AND COMMODITIES START HEADING THROUGH THE ROOF AND EVERYTHING GOES UP IN PRICE(FORGET THIS BS..THERE AINT INFLATION..WHICH IS ALL A LIE) EVENTUALLY AS THOSE COMMODITIES HEAD THROUGH THE ROOF BERNANKE AND OBAMA ARE GOING TO BE FORCED TO SAY TO UNCLE DON VITO CORLEONE" OK OK WE'LL GIVE YOU YOUR MONEY BACK SIR....OK OK LET GO OF THE FINGERS ...PLEASE..."

THEN THE HARD STUFF REALLY BEGINS AS EVERYTHING TANKS.....AND THE DEPRESSION OF THE THIRTIES COULD WELL BE VIEWED AS A RELATIVELY HAPPY TIME...I MEAN WE COULD BE HEADING FOR "THE LITTLE ICE AGE" IF YOU ASK ME....SOCIALISM? WE COULD BE TALKING NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNES BY THAT TIME...LOL....KNOW THAT EVEN IF THIS DOES HAPPEN YOU DID IT TO YOURSELVES BECAUSE OF YOUR GREED. YOU WERE ALL GREEDY...
REPLY RATING
(0 RATINGS)
 
popecash
This comment has been deleted.
Page 1 of 1 1
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR SIGN IN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.
Make a Comment
Comment
 
Download the Daily Finance iPhone Application

Headlines From AOL Money & Finance Partners

CNBC
The Big Money
Smart Money
Kiplinger.com
The street

Visit Money & Finance for stock quotes, the web's best online portfolio manager and the latest business & financial news. Find out about every aspect of personal finance and money management, from finding the best mortgage rates and preventing identity theft to making money, saving money and investing money.